SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Steve Dietrich who wrote (352864)2/3/2003 9:12:03 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (2) of 769667
 
Interesting. Then why did Clinton and Co. claim so vehemently he did NOT lie under oath?

A BJ is not sex, remember?

AND what I remember is that Clinton was fined $90,000 and lost his law license for 5 years for not lying.

Here:
guardian.co.uk

A federal judge yesterday fined Bill Clinton over
$90,000 (£57,000) for denying under oath that he
had had sex with Monica Lewinsky, in an
unprecedented penalty imposed on an incumbent
US president.

The fine was ordered by Judge Susan Webber
Wright, three months after she found him guilty of
contempt for giving false testimony in a sexual
harassment case brought against him by a former
Arkansas government employee, Paula Jones.


Clinton lie? Nah.
Seven months later, after his DNA had been
identified in semen on Ms Lewinsky's dress, he
admitted to an "inappropriate intimate relationship"
with the former White House intern. Although Mr
Clinton argued that having oral sex did not
constitute "sexual relations" under the definition
being used in the Jones case, and also claimed not
to have been paying attention when his lawyer
denied any form of sexual contact, Judge Wright
described his sworn statements as "a wilful refusal to
obey" the court's orders.


You sure you want to continue down this track?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext