<< Actually, Powell began at 10:30 EST, so there is no real objection to the timing of her post. >>
Hmmmm!? What would you say, if zonder had posted even earlier than 11:04, saying that Powell's proof was BS?
A friend on SI informed me that zonder had a post saying that Powell's proof was BS, posted at 10:53am, which was only a few minutes into his speech. How long could she had possibly have listened, and still had time to get on the Internet, prepare her post, and post it?
And... Regardless, the first portion of Powell's speech was a warmup, more descriptive than evidentiary.
zonder was going to condemn Powell's evidence against Iraq, regardless of what Powell WAS going to say.
Here is it's earlier post:
Message 18538284
One has to ask oneself, what is zonder's motivation, for condemning Powell, even before Powell had a chance to get off the ground. There is an old saying.... If it smells like a rat....... |
