>>Let me tell you what is not controversial about these tubes.<<
I found the following paragraphs extremely convincing:
>>I am no expert on centrifuge tubes, but just as an old Army trooper, I can tell you a couple of things: First, it strikes me as quite odd that these tubes are manufactured to a tolerance that far exceeds U.S. requirements for comparable rockets.
Maybe Iraqis just manufacture their conventional weapons to a higher standard than we do, but I don't think so.
Second, we actually have examined tubes from several different batches that were seized clandestinely before they reached Baghdad. What we notice in these different batches is a progression to higher and higher levels of specification, including, in the latest batch, an anodized coating on extremely smooth inner and outer surfaces. Why would they continue refining the specifications, go to all that trouble for something that, if it was a rocket, would soon be blown into shrapnel when it went off?<<
I was already familiar with the substance of many of Powell's facts, so this was actually the most convincing of the things I had not heard before.
Maybe some weapons expert can explain it away, but my guess is that Powell wouldn't have relied on it if it were easily explained. |
