QDRX Message Board - Msg: 1854367

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : QDRX

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Glenn Olsen who wrote (2232)	7/28/1997 6:22:00 PM
From: douglas scott goldstein	of 3977

No chance Glenn. Let's face it; and I think that it's about time all of us wishful shareholders face it. QDRX's total market size for its products isn't even that big to begin with- and even if they took large shares of these relatively small markets (which would take years, if ever), given the 40k+ outstanding shares, it would be a tremendous feat for the company to even earn $0.10 a share. Come on, simple math fellas. Do it and you'll figure out in a matter of minutes that even if things were to go beautifully for these guys over the next few years, the tremendous amount of equity that this company has been forced into using for financing has literally destroyed all of their prospects of ever producing a reasonable EPS number. And, as for Palermo's salary... we should go up to Rhode Island with QDRX clubs in our hands and demand that his pay get cut substantially... $250k? To me, this number may be the true indication that management does not have the same kind of relationship with the company that they should have. I'm out. At least I'm only 23- if the stock moved to $1 three years from now, I would still have made a decent return. DG

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next