SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JohnM who wrote (71821)2/6/2003 2:27:14 PM
From: carranza2  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
Always offering friendly posts, aren't you. No sarcasm there. No.

Let's not get petulant, John. There was no sarcasm intended. I am sorry that you interpreted it as such, but that is not my problem as I cannot control your interpretations. If you want sarcasm, read my po-mo post.

The point, to be a bit more clear about it, is that if you accept Powell's version about the tubes, which I think we all do--heck, you said somewhere that you might vote for him if he runs as a Presidential candidate, so I assume you believe him--then the only effective counter-argument is that Powell was lying about the tubes. I doubt that he is misinformed about something so critical.

The commentaries by the experts posted elsewhere here suggest that Powell is not misinformed, ergo, it seems that the only means available to you to counter the import of the tubes' significance is to find evidence that Powell lied, which is what I said.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News