SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Shuttle Columbia STS-107

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Rande Is who started this subject2/6/2003 7:52:14 PM
From: AllansAlias  Read Replies (1) of 627
 
I grew up on the edge of another country. I am not American. My first memory of your country is 1963... my parents' concern over an event very far away. Dallas? Where the heck is that? I also remember we had no TV then.

We ended up getting a TV. We had one channel -- the CBC. I remember American cartoons. They were loony.

I learned to love TV in 1969. "The Eagle has landed" indeed. I remember the feeling that we had all done something. I doubt very much that Newfoundland made much of a contribution to the space program in the 50's and 60's, but I still felt like "we" had done something. That's the magic.

It was not a year later that I had an Apollo model. It was detailed enough for $15. The only tricky part at all was gluing on the service module reaction control assemblies -g (you can seen them clearly here: www2k.biglobe.ne.jp. I became proficient at demo'ing the staging during ascent. Because the various stages were detachable, the configuration that was most precarious was when it was standing upright. (It had a LEM as well, although it really pissed me off that one could not separate the ascent module. -g/ng) Anyway, if we had company, I was expected to get out the model and do the demo. -g I loved doing that.

Since then, I have followed the program as many of you have. I think it would be a lively and good discussion to talk about where it should go, but tonight I thought to say something else.

With keen interest, I have followed the Columbia failure and the loss of the crew. I was thinking at one point, going over scenarios in my mind as many of us have done, that the experience of the crew might be a factor.

This thought lead me to read the bio's of the crew. These people were so accomplished; reading between the lines of the bio's, one has to think that they would have been among the finest in all of what they did. What a terrible loss.

I wanted to read about McCool... hadn't flown before. Then I see that he landed on aircraft carriers 400 times. This guy was a steely-eyed missile man. Experience was not a factor I am sure, and a I am selfishly happy that I took the time tonight to figure that out.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext