SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who started this subject2/7/2003 7:30:00 PM
From: Mighty_Mezz  Read Replies (1) of 12465
 
Conratulations to Henry Mishkoff, front line soldier in the fight to save the First Amendment.

"The rooftops of our past have evolved into the internet domain names of our present"
====
Appeals Court Upholds Right of Online Critic to Use Shopping Mall's
Name in Domain Name

Dallas Web Designer Did Not Confuse Internet Users, Infringe on
Trademark in Fan Site, Gripe Sites

WASHINGTON, D.C. – In a ringing affirmation of free speech
rights on the Internet, a federal appeals court has upheld the right of
a Dallas man to use the name of a local shopping mall as the domain name
for a Web site singing the praises of that mall, as well as a second Web
site denouncing the mall's owner for suing him under the federal
trademark laws.

Computer consultant Henry Mishkoff has been involved in a
dispute with the nationwide shopping mall developer Taubman Company,
which was building a mall called The Shops at Willow Bend, in Plano,
Texas, near his Dallas home. Mishkoff originally built a "fan site"
praising the mall, but after Taubman claimed his site violated its
trademark and demanded it be taken down, he developed a site criticizing
the company.

In the fall of 2001, the Michigan district court ordered Mishkoff to
remove both of his sites from the Web, taking a dangerous step toward
restricting non-commercial speech on the Internet. The appeals court
suspended the order against the gripe site in March while it considered
the First Amendment implications of the case.

Today's opinion overturns the district court's injunctions that
prevented Mishkoff from using the domain name "shopsatwillowbend.com" in
his fan site and variations on "taubmansucks.com" and
"shopsatwillowbendsucks.com" in his subsequent gripe sites. In a
unanimous opinion authored by Circuit Judge Richard Surhheinrich, the
court wrote that Mishkoff clearly had no commercial intent in either of
his sites, that there was no likelihood that any visitors to his sites
would be confused as to their purpose and that allowing the injunctions
to remain would harm the public by curtailing free speech rights.

The Court stated, "Taubman concedes that Mishkoff is 'free to shout
"Taubman Sucks!" from the rooftops'… Essentially, this is what he has
done in his domain name. The rooftops of our past have evolved into the
internet domain names of our present."

"This is the first time an appellate court has addressed the trademark
and free speech rights for an Internet fan site not meant to mislead and
gripe site, and it was particularly important that the court get things
right. This decision will set an important precedent protecting the
rights of citizens to criticize and to praise. It is quite a victory,"
said Paul Alan Levy, an attorney with the Public Citizen Litigation
Group who represented Mishkoff.

"I'm very gratified to learn that the Court of Appeals has agreed with
most of the points I've been making all along," Mishkoff said.
"Hopefully, the ruling will help to ensure that other people will be
able to exercise their right of free speech without having to worry
about being harassed by big companies with deep pockets."

Barbara Harvey has served as Mishkoff's local counsel in Detroit.
Professor Milton Mueller, director of the Syracuse University's Graduate
Program in Telecommunications and Network Management Research and
co-director of The Convergence Center, has served as Mishkoff's pro bono
expert witness who wrote a report on the case, available online at
taubmansucks.com.

A copy of the court's opinion is on the Web at
pacer.ca6.uscourts.gov.
Public Citizen became involved in the case because it has a history of
defending free speech on the Internet. For more information on this and
other online free speech cases, go to
citizen.org.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext