Duke, Re: And some of these answers can't really be disclosed, even to a shareholder, BUT the exercise price can and should be.
I don't know it the new SEC rules require disclosure filings at grant date, or just closer to the exercise date.
Don't you agree?
Yes, I believe there is some common ground between us on this issue. Like I said, I'm all for reform, especially if it involves disclosure of executive compensation. I don't believe that employee compensation should be disclosed, however, since that's a fundamental competitive policy that Intel has for their workforce.
Bringing the topic back to what I want to find out: is there anything criminal going on at Intel? Are execs truly getting overcompensated at the detriment of the shareholders? I believe those are all very valid concerns, but I have a problem with the way Carl and you have been going about answering it. Carl's questions have come very close to simple baseless accusations. He has become erratic, and you are defending him. If you want to address the issue in a logical manner, then I am willing to learn from it. But let's not jump to conclusions. I see no proof that Intel has acted criminally so far. |
