Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: JohnM who wrote (72397)	2/8/2003 2:23:18 PM
From: paul_philp	Read Replies (1) of 281500

Of course, that's hyperbole beyond excessive, Paul. The hyperbole was simply a match to the hyperbole of your post. The solution is to avoid the Clinton is morally superior to Bush line of argument altogether. do I intend to quit posting compliments about the previous administration when I think the conversation calls for it. There is much about Clinton's record which is admirable. For all the screaming from the Bush folk, they are now scrambling to try and extend the Clinton North Korea policy. The policy may suck but it's the only game in town. But I will not post them to you. To repeat, best not post your negative stuff to me. The only time I ever mention Clinton is when the moral comparisson is made. If you make that comparisson, I will refute it. If you want to discuss the relative merits of policies and approaches, great. If you want to posit that Clinton was one of the best president ever, great. I don't even object to Clinton being put forward as an example of a great moral leader. We all have opinions. However, if you use Clinton to attempt to slam the moral character of people who support the war, I will object. Paul

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next