Darren I re-read your post and have come to the conclusion that you are correct. We need to look at the big picture.
No one has proven Iraq has any weapons but Powell presented a case that he wanted them. I clearly think that is grounds for attack.
Not only that I think we need to take out every country that has a dangerous, deceptive leader. In fact I think it must be done immediately before it is too late. However, in order to prevent retaliation, we must proceed in a logical "big picture" order.
Therfore I propose we attack (in order)
1) North Korea for having and threatening to use nuclear weapons
2) Pakistan (very dangerous they threatened India with nuclear weapons and are also harboring Al Qaeda terrorists)
3) India (very dangerous they threatened Pakistan with nuclear weapons)
4) All of the broken off countries from the USSR known to have nuclear weapons (who knows who they might sell that stuff to)
5) Afganistan for harboring Al Queda terrorists
6) Saudi Arabia for harboring Al Queda and because Saudia Arabian terrorits flew those planes into the WTC
7) Iran for having and using chemical weapons and sponsoring terrorists
8) Columbia for having and supporting dope dealers
9) Libya we never got rid of that evil dictator, who knows what he might do
10) Iraq. Why Iraq? because Hussein is evil and although we have no proof, we suspect he might be hiding something. We do know the he is capable of using nerve gas because he used that on Iran after we gave it to him and backed him in that war. Oh well we have no use for him now, since Iran was eliminated in step #7 above. Besides, he is admittedly evil, and he just may have something although we can't find it.
Since Iraq seems the least threatening of those countries, it seems we can put them off until last. For surprise affect, we better start with the first 4 immediately and at once before anything bad happens. I vote for a huge surprise attack starting tomorrow. After we have ridden the world of those evil countries, we can then easily mop up the other countries more or less in the order where we know for a fact they have something as opposed to us thinking they might have something. Hussein is suposedly running around hiding stuff from inspectors that can not find a damn thing. Stupid incompetent inspectors can not find a smoking gun and neither can Powell. But it's there I just know it. Even if wrong, who cares? It's all in the best interest of "The Big Picture".
So you see darren, I have concluded that you are 100% correct and we need to immediately appoint ourselves the world's policemen, get rid of anyone who is evil and we suspect could potentially be hiding something.
There is only one logical conclusion. We need to start WW III before someone else does! I vote for tomorrow.
hope slight the sarcasm was dectable
M |
