Foreign Policy Discussion Thread Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: KonKilo who wrote (3635)	2/9/2003 9:28:12 AM
From: lorne	Read Replies (1) of 15987

ShiloCat. You said....." I agree with Hawk that the bellicosity of Bush's stance has focused and motivated both Saddam and the UN. What I don't want to see is a unilateral, preemptive invasion by the US. I think it would set an unsustainable precedent and be ultimately counterproductive. "..... OK.....And if after all this show of force By the USA trying to get sadam to comply with UN demands he...sadam...tells the world to jam it because he believes world support to be on his side. What then? Should the forces that are in the region now be and sent home saying ...Oh well we tried. Should sadam be given a free hand to do as he wishes? In other words if the UN caves should the USA go home?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next