Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TimF who wrote (160421)	2/10/2003 1:10:01 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) of 1577834

A recent story in the Los Angeles Times reports that at least 10 percent of the 625 war prisoners captured in Afghanistan and now held at the notorious US naval base prison in Guantanamo Bay have “no meaningful connection” with the Taliban or Al Qaeda. to the extent that is true it is in my opinion a lot more serious then the whole Geneva convention issue. The article also said that many Afghans now in Guantanamo Bay were forcibly conscripted into the Taliban army A lot of enemy prisoners that we have taken in every war where foricbly conscripted. Yeah, and you're point was? Why should they be held prisoner indefinitely for that reason......just to punish them twice? The prisoners have been deemed “unlawful combatants” by the US authorities in order to deny them official prisoner-of-war status and the most rudimentary human rights. They have no access to their families or lawyers and the US government has given no indication when or if the prisoners, some of whom are only 16 years of age, will ever be charged or brought to trial. Under their current status, the prisoners can be held as long as the US government decrees. The actual treatment you mention above (as oppose to the offical legal status) is no different then that given to regular POWs. They can be held indefinitly (or at least to the end of the war) and they don't get to see family or lawyers, and they don't have to be brought to trial. Then why are they denied POW status? These and other human rights organisations have pointed out that the detainees are being held in contravention of the Geneva Convention, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the US Constitution. Its easy to make those charges but the article says nothing to actually back them up. How do you know? Have you checked out the provisions of the Geneva Convention, the International Covenant et al? Amnesty International has described the conditions at Camp Delta as “cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment Of course they don't have access to cable TV and comfortable air conditioned rooms... The conditionas are spartan, maybe even harsh but nothing discribed in the article is cruel and inhuman. What is your definition of cruel and inhuman? The US is holding two Australian citizens who haven’t been charged with anything. Enemies captured as part of a war don't get charged with anything. They are just locked up as an alternative t oshooting them. Thats' standard protocol.......for barbaric nations but I thought we were a little better than that. Thanks for straightening me out on that one. Someone has asked why haven’t the inspectors gone into America. Why are they allowed to have weapons of mass destruction and no one else? We didn't sign a ceasefire agreement or other treaty obliging us to get rid of our WMD. Also there is the purely practical self interest of the US at stake. I see nothing wrong with acting in that self interest esp. when it is also reduces the threat to other countries. That's why need to get the conservatives out of the gov't as much as possible. ted

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next