SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bob who wrote (357001)2/10/2003 3:18:25 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (4) of 769670
 
the problem is you can't violate one person's human rights for another person's human rights. That is the issue, even if you do believe the fetus is a person, it all comes down to human rights.

Say a parent has a 5 year old child that requires one of his/her kidneys (I know that is impossible because adult kidneys can't be transplanted into a child, so substitute bone marrow or whatever you want)... we do not by law require that the parent become a donor. I mean you would hope that any parent will do whatever is humanly possible for their child, but they are not required by law to do so. The removal of a parents kidney is supported by his/her claims to personal rights.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News