SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : DON'T START THE WAR

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: zonder who wrote (7034)2/10/2003 5:07:10 PM
From: Alastair McIntosh  Read Replies (1) of 25898
 
You seem to be confused. There was no oil pipeline to be built. Pakistan entered into an agreement to buy gas from Turkmenistan. The pipeline would have delivered gas under the Turkmenistan/Pakistan agreement. Unocal was the lead contractor in the consortium that would have constructed and operated the pipeline. Unocal withdrew from the project in 1998 and has stated several times that they have no further interest in the project.

Do you have any evidence showing that Unocal has indicated renewed interest in the project?

Construction of the pipeline will benefit Afghanistan as well as Turkmenistan and Pakistan. No reason why a U.S. company should not be involved in the construction.

Also, you can spin the election of Karzai any way you want but he was elected by a Loya Jirga convened under U. N. auspices. This link lists the members of the Special Independent Commission that convened the Loya Jirga:

eurasianet.org
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext