SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Hawkmoon who wrote (73189)2/11/2003 10:15:31 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (3) of 281500
 
I have never supported Bin Laden BUT he has outsmarted our Administration...The most powerful military in the world has trouble going after our biggest threat...

We're taking on Saddam because he's easy to pick on and the NeoCons (dominated by the Likudniks) have hijacked the Bush Administration...Pat Buchanan agrees with me on this -- last time I checked he was quite conservative.

Colonel David Hackworth makes so much sense when he says its insane to go to war in Iraq when we HAVE FAILED to properly secure our homeland...Wolfowitz is a hard right wing NeoCON who believes the Middle East can be reshaped quickly after a victory in Iraq -- there are a number of experts that don't agree...The CIA said again today that Saddam is most dangerous IF we attack and that's when he is most likely to use any WMDs that he might have...Al Qaeda would love nothing more than to have the U.S. get involved in an expensive and counterproductive war in Iraq...IMO, Bush has not carefully examined the unintended consequences of this rush to war...We can not win the all-important global war against terrorism unless we have A LOT of co-operation from allies around the world AND Bush is doing a great job of antagonizing them.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext