SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JohnM who wrote (73555)2/13/2003 11:54:19 AM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
The problem with calling a piece, the Hermann piece, which offers harsh criticisms of the Israeli government as anti-semitic is the term loses all serious meaning

John, Herman repeatedly called the policies of the Zionists and the State of Israel for the last hundred years - not just the current government - "genocide" and "ethnic cleansing", thus depriving those words of all serious meaning. As I pointed out, one can reliably say that a people suffering genocide or ethnic cleansing decrease in numbers; the Palestinians of the West Bank and Gaza have more than tripled in number since 1967.

I do not include "criticism of the Israeli government" as anti-Semitism. But I do include Zionism=racism=colonialism=Nazism as anti-Semitic; what is it but another way of saying that nationalism is a good thing for other people but the Jews don't deserve any?

The third category I object to (which included some of scott's more recent posts) is the Perle-Feith-Wolfowitz-are-members-of-the-World-Zionist-Conspiracy. They are working for Israel, not the US. The Jews are behind it all. This is The Protocols of the Elders of Zion tricked out in a new suit.

Did you notice that hyper-dove Rabbi Lerner (certainly no friend to the Sharon government) has been banned from speaking at the next anti-war rallies by ANSWER as a "pro-Israel" speaker? Meaning that Rabbi Lerner favors a two-state solution; he is pro-Israel and pro-Palestine. ANSWER favors a one-state solution: no Israel.

Above all, I consider the idea that Israel, out of all the countries in the world, uniquely deserves to be wiped off the map, anti-Semitic.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News