Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 45.51

+10.7%

Jan 9 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Paul Engel who wrote (27659)	7/29/1997 4:13:00 AM
From: Jeff Fox	of 186894

Paul, re:,"Interlaced TV transmission" Ok, thanks. Now that we know, answer me this... The PC graphics system already uses a complete frame buffer. This is the "1, 2 or 2Meg" you see in the feature bullets for graphics cards. PC graphics "paint" into the buffer, often quite slowly and thus must be fully buffered. The newer architectures use more frame buffer for display list, texture maps and the like. So what is the big deal about decoding interlace into the frame buffer and why is/was Intel so adamat about receiving the encoded digital stream in progressive order? Jeff P.S. Thanks for your insight, and always remember, "...in fact you run into all sorts of language problems with words." quote - A relative of a Nobel Prize Winner

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next