SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LindyBill who wrote (73624)2/13/2003 5:12:19 PM
From: Jacob Snyder  Read Replies (6) of 281500
 
<double cross NATO>

There seems to be a widespread feeling, that the Europeans are reneging on their NATO obligations, stabbing the U.S. in the back.

A little history:

1. NATO's mandate is explicitly, solely, defensive. It was set up to stop 10,000 Soviet tanks from reaching Paris. That's what W. Europe signed up for. It was never intended, and nobody ever agreed to a mandate that included, any offensive military action of any kind, even in Europe.

2. NATO is (again, explicitly, solely) limited to military activity in Europe. It was never envisioned, there are no obligations, for extra-European war, not even defensive ones.

3. Every nation in NATO agrees to act under American leadership. But only to achieve the goals previously agreed to. If those goals are now going to be changed and expanded, then the new goals must be negotiated, and consensus reached. There is no obligation to automatically follow the U.S., when the U.S. wants to do things far outside the original scope of the alliance.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext