Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TimF who wrote (161000)	2/14/2003 11:44:55 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (4) of 1574255

I think that might be our money's worth depending on what happens after the coup. What about the other question. If we established beyond a doubt that Saddam has a lot of hidden WMD (chemical and bio weapons) and is working hard on nukes and was perhaps 5 to 10 years away, would you support removing Saddam? In other words is it really "Give the inspectors a chance", or is it no intervention in Iraq under any circumstances? My comment about the money is that its too late......Bush is bent on war. He's moved all the necessary troops to that arena. Its pretty much a done deal. As for no war at any cost, that's not my position at all. If and when we see a true material breach, then I would say Saddam either get rid of it or prepare to have your ass beat. However, a material breach is not a missile that goes ten miles farther than prescribed by the UN resolution when its guidance system is not attached as Powell would like us to believe. A material breach is when the US is truly at risk, and frankly, based on what the inspectors have said to date, I don't think we will find that kind of breach. ted

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next