Foreign Policy Discussion Thread Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: KLP who wrote (4036)	2/14/2003 4:35:05 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) of 15987

I donot agree with your interpretation of the the meaning of stupid. Clearly it seems to me you don't seem to have a clue about the dictionary definition of the word stupid. On one or many issues a person can be clueless. That does not demean anyone on this thread. I'd suggest you read the dialog and demonstrate some clear logical error in my posts to zonder. I directly refuted zonders proffers in a way that to me clearly suggested on these issues being discussed that zonder was clueless. I gave examples as to why I thought zonder's opinions on the issue being discussed was clueless. NOW last line of FADT. I certainly won't throw you into FADT "jail" merely for publicly calling into question something I say (so long as your response is logically supported by facts, even if incorrect)... The term stupid to me is calling into question the logic behind an opinion expressed. Saying someone is expressing stupid ideas is not name calling. It's expressing clearly someone else is expressing ideas that are not supported by facts or logic. 5.) Remember it's only a debating thread, not the UN.. OH yeah, kiss kiss :-)

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next