SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Imperial Sugar (IPSU)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Patentlawmeister who wrote (111)2/15/2003 8:17:39 PM
From: Crossy  Read Replies (1) of 121
 
Cuda,
I re-read the 10Q filing that sort of entered the wall street world thru the back door (no Press Release). I wonder why this lowballing ? Does the company want to aid insitutions wanting to get in cheap ?

MetLife already took up this chance. Maybe others will follow. Now to the real meat in the 10Q.. While the 10Q gives the impression of a break-even business, this is not the case. Given current market environments wrt. to refining and raw materials, the company would have made $4.1m this quarter and that was BEFORE CLOSING their most inefficient refinery asset in Texas.

How do I arrive at this ?

1)First of all it is worth noting that the GROSS MARGIN (Net sales - COG Sold) / NET SALES increased to $21m or 7.5% (750BP) from 5.3% (530BP). And this was before sugar prices and the sugar margin rose further and before IPSU closed the worst performing refinery. and before furhter downstream opportunities with bigger margins are tackled. How much could this grow to ? My gut feeling is about 10% Gross Margin should be possible. That would be $27m with current revenue levels.

2) The $14.1m in SG&A has a $2.1m in one-time consulting fees (professional fees for restructuring and refinancing) embedded. Going forward this should reduce to $12m per quarter

3) The asset impairment charge of $2.8m is also not recurring becuause it's related to the closure of their Sugar-Land refinining facility.

4) There's still a discount to receivables sold to securitization affiliate of around $2m on the operations statement. The company bought back this A/R line in their refinancing operation, so this cost item is essentially no longer recurring.

Summing up, if we take out this extraordinary charges plus use the NEW financing obligations of $0.5m per quarter instead of the old $5.0 per quarter, then we would have ended with a GAAP profit wrt. to ordinary operations of $4.1m or $0.41 per share pretax.

Going forward what could be expected of Imperial Sugar as to earnings potential ??

My best case scenario is as follows:

Sales $275m
- COG Sold $247m
GROSS Margin $ 28m (or 10% of Net Sales)
- SG&A $ 12m
EBITDA $ 16m
- D&A § 3.5m
EBIT $ 12.5m
- Interest $ 0.5m
PRETAX INCOME $ 12m

That's huge - $1.20 per share quarterly pretax EPS going forward on 10% Gross Margin assumption (which looks attainable this year if refining margin trends continue and the company optimizes operations as it has been doing recently)

Now again let's look at "elasticities". How much would 1 BP of margins add to the bottom line ? Answer is 1BP of gross margin improvement would net $27.5k to pretax earnings. 10 BP would provide around $0.275m or around 2.75 cents per share per quarter pretax. So each 100BP of gross margin improvement would unlock another $0.275 quarterly pretax earnings. This looks good, for sure..

If this trend goes on I see 2 things coming:
1) Share buyback
2) Dividend (assured if double tax is eliminated)
3) Acquisitions using company stock as currency if Book value is above 1

rgrds
CROSSY
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext