The Boxing Ring Revived Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Boxing Ring Revived

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (4484)	2/16/2003 1:50:28 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) of 7720

If one had confidence that the nations in the UN were acting in a principled manner, I would agree with you. But IMO, the decisions in the UN now have little to do with protecting the region from Iraqi aggression and their acquision of stores of chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons when Saddam has shown clearly that he has no hesitancy using these weapons even against his own citizens. They have to do more with France, Germany, and Russia trying to protect their trade with Iraq (which in many cases openly violate the UN sanctions) and with trying to establish Europe as a world super-power to compete against the US. I still see a lot of parallels between the mid 1930s and today. And I think there are a lot of people who in retrospect wish the world had held firm against Germany in the 1930s. But the world waffled, in part because some of those countries, including France, were benefiting from their trade with Germany that was enabling Germany to rearm illegally. History does repeat itself. but sometimes you have a chance to write a different outcome.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next