SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor
GDXJ 98.59-2.8%Nov 13 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: E. Charters who wrote (93604)2/16/2003 8:18:40 PM
From: goldsheet  Read Replies (2) of 116759
 
Seems like only Quebec and Nunavut seem to welcome mining,
with Ontario slightly tolerant, and British Columbia outright hostile.

The Fraser Instititue (libertarian think tank) had a survey of best and worst place to be a miner;

"In the 2002/2003 survey, Nevada and Alberta tie for top place on the Policy Potential Index with a score of 87. This is Nevada's third straight year for being rated as having the best mineral policies, and Alberta's first. Nevada tied with Chile for first place last year, and was alone at first place in 2000/2001. Other top-rated jurisdictions include Chile (85), Manitoba (81), New Brunswick (79), Australia (78), Quebec (77), Ontario (76), New Mexico (75), and Saskatchewan (74). "

"The worst performing jurisdictions, based on policy, are Indonesia (19), Zimbabwe (20), British Columbia and Russia (tied at 23), Kazakhstan (24), Papua New Guinea (25,), Wisconsin and India (tied at 26), and California, the Philippines, and Washington (all with 29). Also worth noting is that this is the first time in the survey's six-year history that British Columbia has not been rated last for its mining policies."

REF: fraserinstitute.ca
fraserinstitute.ca
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext