DON'T START THE WAR Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Brumar89 who wrote (10169)	2/19/2003 8:49:52 AM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (1) of 25898

>>>So many people overlooking the likes of Saddam.<<< Brumar, I think it's time you put that argument to bed. There's not a single poster here on this thread "overlooking" Saddam. It'd be my bet every one of us would like to see him brought before a war crime tribunal. Why hasn't the administration done this, or at least indicted him in absentia. Don't Bush and Blair wanna give the Iraqi people some inspiration to overthrow him? I think you have to ask: Why isn't this being done? And then consider: Well, maybe there is something else at play here. What I find terribly ironic here is the Bush Administration had been considering replacing Saddam with a man Denmark now wants to indict for war crimes. This is the guy that was their man until they decided to have Americna General Tommy Franks run things. news.bbc.co.uk

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next