SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (11088)2/19/2003 11:32:10 PM
From: Israel  Read Replies (2) of 19428
 
should be good for a chuckle..

SEC Considering New Restrictions On Short Selling -FT
Wednesday February 19, 6:19 pm ET

NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- U.S. securities regulators are considering sweeping changes to rules governing short selling, The Financial Times reports in an article on its Web site Wednesday.
Securities and Exchange Commission (News - Websites) staff are expected to present proposals for reform to new chairman William Donaldson (News) next week, according to the article.

ADVERTISEMENT


Among the proposals could be rules forcing traders to borrow stock to cover their short positions, the newspaper reports. Under the current rules, traders can take out "naked" short positions over an unlimited number of shares, putting huge downward pressure on an illiquid stock.

Regulators are less concerned about short-selling in liquid stocks and may consider loosening the rules for large companies while tightening them for shares in small companies, the report says.

Officials also want a consistent set of rules across all U.S. markets. Under current regulations, traders are forbidden from shorting a stock quoted on the New York Stock Exchange (News - Websites) when the price is falling, but the Nasdaq has its own rule that is triggered differently and isn't applied to small stocks in the over-the-counter market, the Financial Times reports.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext