Gold Price Monitor Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor

GDXJ 99.85

+6.2%

Nov 24 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: long-gone who wrote (93653)	2/20/2003 12:20:53 AM
From: Enigma	Read Replies (1) of 116764

No I haven't seen the 'evidence' but it has all of the appearence of a stunt. These things hardly ever go to Court as you must know. I don't know if Barrick has countersued - the problem for them is how do you quantify damages? So they might have to go to court, and IMO it might be a good thing to have the whole thing laid out and disproved. This could be a very expensive suit for Blanchard. In the meantime I notice that Barrick's share price seems to be increasing relative to Newmont - there must be an investment strategy to play - if you want to bet on the gap narrowing further? Maybe we'll see Barrick's share price overtake Newmont's in the next couple of years?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next