Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: stockman_scott who wrote (76372)	2/21/2003 5:49:42 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (2) of 281500

Scott, I can see that the bush doctrine of preemption might upset some. The reality is that Iraq is not such a case. Iraq has violated the peace agreement and that gives us legal rights to intervene. I would suggest you re-read the Pollack NYTimes op ed piece you posted earlier. You can be for military action without adopting the beliefs of neocons. Realism is a better reason to got to war than a neocon ideology or in other times a reflexive anti communist one. In this debate you just concluded with mikem, carranza and myself you demonstrate much reasoned thought, although in error imo. In the past you have sometimes posted questionable and hateful material from questionable sources imo. Now you seem to be a different guy than i attacked and got a suspension from FADG/Ken. Which guy are you Scott? mike

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next