SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: i-node who wrote (161928)2/23/2003 2:51:08 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (2) of 1579380
 
There is no disagreement, FROM ANYONE, that Iraq has 2,000,000 tons of chemical agents, tens of thousands of liters of biological weapons.

FROM ANYONE? You really think so, you stupid %#!$%&***#&?You don't know what you know. Below is a link [first of two] from one of your party faithful. They push the case as hard as they can against Iraq, and the best they can come up with is that what they "know" is that the UN inspectors "believe" Iraq may have more weapons of mass destruction.

Do you understand, O Wise One? No one knows for sure.......that's why the inspectors are back in Iraq. Why are you and Bush afraid to let the process run to its conclusion?

avot.org

We know that UN weapons inspectors supervised the destruction of much of Iraq's arsenal, including 40,000 chemical munitions, nearly half a million liters of chemical agents, almost two million liters of chemical precursors, and eight different types of delivery systems - including ballistic missile warheads. And we know that UN officials believe Baghdad has stockpiled far greater amounts of chemical and biological agents than it destroyed.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext