SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia Corp. (NOK)
NOK 6.965+0.8%12:37 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: 49thMIMOMander who wrote (2806)2/26/2003 12:01:32 AM
From: quick_thinking  Read Replies (1) of 9255
 
> The WAP and I-mode issue is much more than byte or double byte fonts.

Sure. The WAP versus i-mode discussion is very old by now, and you can find many of the points summarized here:
eurotechnology.com

Essentially it makes no sense to compare WAP and i-mode directly. What makes sense to compare is a particular implementation of WAP-based mobile internet with i-mode. The reason is that there is a wildly successful implementation of WAP in Japan, while I think you'll find few people who'll support the idea that WAP was wildly successful in Europe or US. Indeed, Openwave's (ex-Phone.com)'s by far biggest customer was or still is in Japan.

> For example, the issue of WAP using 160 byte SMS message transfers until the operator has got GPRS implemented

I don't understand your point - that may be a point which is valid only for the particular WAP implementations in Europe - don't forget that other countries, like Korea and Japan and US have totally different mobile internet businesses than Europe.

KDDI in Japan has a full WAP-based mobile internet system with more than 10 million regular paying users who use email and photo-mail emails before CDMA2000-1X (KDDI's version of GPRS) was implemented. KDDI got around the limits you mention long before starting 3G services, for which they also have a couple of million users now.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext