SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: zonder who wrote (4701)2/26/2003 1:39:07 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (3) of 15987
 
In the United States, no one is under the illusion that the disruption of a friend's household is not an imposition. In most cases, I would rather pay for a room than impose. Expecting an invitation, except in limited cases, would be considered rude. Even if an invitation were extended, most people would hesitate, wondering if the person were realistic about how able she is to accommodate guests. Thus, for many people, accepting such an invitation is, in fact, tied up in the expense of travel.

Cheap rings are, of course, a selling point, not to the prospective bride, but to the groom. The idea is to get the best you can afford, not to save money per se. It is very likely true that brides here would not appreciate advertizing cheapness, either, and would be depressed at going to one of those bargain shops. However, if they get something that would be priced beyond their reach at Tiffany's, it is hard to complain <g>.

Few people in the State's would care to admit that they are short of money, although you are probably right, they are less inhibited about such an admission........
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext