SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (77823)2/26/2003 3:36:45 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
But they also tried a logical case that Saddam was really a menace.

I think we are in agreement that they would have been much better off if they had taken Pollack's arguments, with an exception or two, and made them the center pieces of theirs. So I must confess to never having seen something I would label "a logical" argument from them.

What we haven't seen is any logic from the protesters, just a general denial that there is a problem.

That's definitely a consequence of demonstrations. But it's not because demonstrators, in some sort of massive declaration, are saying there is no problem. Rather, to repeat myself much too often, it is because they are saying, Bush hasn't offered a serious case. No demonstrations, or at least not large ones when we attacked Afghanistan, because the case was made.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News