Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: JohnM who wrote (77858)	2/26/2003 4:10:04 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (2) of 281500

The Washington Post recently asked some survey questions about Iraq. I think this one is very interesting: 7. What do you think is more important - for the United States to move quickly against Iraq, even if that means acting without the support of the United Nations Security Council; or for the United States to keep trying to win support from the United Nations Security Council, even if that means moving more slowly against Iraq? Move Gain No quickly support opinion 2/23/03 39 56 5 COMPARE TO: What do you think is more important - for the United States to move quickly against Iraq, even if that means acting without international support; or for the United States to gain international support, even if that delays action against Iraq? Move Gain No quickly support opinion 2/9/03 37 59 4 2/5/03 All 41 55 5 Watched Powell 48 49 3 Didn't watch 29 64 6 1/27/03 31 64 5 The people who watched the Powell presentation feel a lot more strongly that swift action is needed than the ones who did not. Maybe they were more receptive to begin with, maybe not.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next