Guidance and Visibility Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Guidance and Visibility

AAPL 273.80

+0.2%

Dec 29 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: baddtiming who wrote (84987)	2/26/2003 6:23:02 PM
From: Mark Konrad	Read Replies (2) of 208838

OTProbably the usual defense contractors...but they are not doing so well at this time (betting on a very short war may be shortsighted). I'm LMAO about all this whining over $95 billion dollars. At two or three or even five times the price, it's CHEAP! How much will we save in lives, business, and future defense spending with a stable (read "US installed") government in IRAQ? For that matter, we could do what we never could do with a conquered Japan or Germany: pay for the war and occupation costs from seized state assets (oil). Gee, how much would we save in future costs with the U.S. as a member of OPEC? If France or Germany whine, move the UN to Paris or Berlin and let them deal with all the security costs, espionage, deadbeat diplomats, etc., we've had to absorb for 50+ years! Of course, this is all in my good-natured opinion--MK--

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next