SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG)
MYNG 0.0700+5.7%Feb 21 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Claude Cormier who wrote (30662)2/27/2003 11:50:03 AM
From: steadyasyougo  Read Replies (2) of 34075
 
Claude, this brings up a question based on my DD.
I had always heard that companies, big or small, do not like to mess with placer deposits. Proving up resources and reserves is just too difficult.

Well, Ron Atwood testified at trial that he worked for Newmont, that he had worked on 22 projects, and that 20 of them were placers. He didn't really say how many were with Newmont, but I would assume most were. Realizing how companies don't like placers, Ron has to be just about the most experienced and best expert in the world on placers? 20 placer deposits, that seems like a lot.

Of course, Ron says ours is not a true placer, it is an alluvial fill. As I said before, I look at the conglomerate as a stack of placers. With 35 veneros, or pay streaks, identified, that implies at least 70 placer layers. There may be more in some areas.

Nice that we have such an expert on our team.
gerald
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext