Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: FaultLine who wrote (78098)	2/27/2003 3:27:54 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (2) of 281500

Jonathan Schell vs. Ignatieff on Charlie Rose last night...I thought to myself as I watched it that I could tell who made the better points by simply turning off the volume and watching the facial expressions. I did so for a few minutes. It's an interesting exercise I heartily recommend, particularly if you already know 90% of what each of the participants is likely to say as was the case here. Schell was sweaty faced, many, many facial tics, intense. In a word, unattractive. His presence suggested a shrillness of tone that seemed to really bother Ignatieff, who was much better dressed and serene. He kept looking down, probably to a monitor. However, it appeared that this gesture was one of exasperation with Schell's bumptiousness, a sort of "What did the idiot say now?" physically expressed. When I turned the volume back on, my suspicions about Schell were confirmed. However, Ignatieff was a lot more diplomatic than Schell, who kept interrupting him.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next