SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Boxing Ring Revived

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (4987)2/27/2003 5:12:27 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) of 7720
 
You could also say he is a bulwark against fundamentalism in the region. That is why the Kuwaitis and the Saudis supported him in his war with Iran (and why we supported him). They didn't want to see that vital waterway, which the war was really being fought over, in the hands of a country run by Mullahs.

A fundamentalist Muslim state in Iraq could be a good deal more destabilizing and more of a threat to us, then Saddam is or ever has been. That Saudis know that it could certainly be a huge threat to them if Saddam was replaced by anything like an Iranian type of government. I wouldn't count on the US to be able to install anyone in power there. Once Saddam is gone, Iraq will be a wild card- and it could certainly get a lot worse in the region.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext