DON'T START THE WAR Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Mark Konrad who wrote (13836)	2/28/2003 2:22:30 AM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (1) of 25898

Irrefutable proof that Saddam was involved in 9/11. That he kicked the weapons inspectors out, when he didn't is insufficient reason; that he's not in compliance with a UN Resolution, when others like Israel are as well, is insufficient reason; that he used gas in previous warfare when his warring opponent did as well, is insufficient; that America has to liberate people who've not asked to be liberated is an insufficient reason; that America has unilaterally decided to change governments in the Middle East is also an insufficient reason. Bush's invasion would be a clear violation of international law. Moreover, he used bogus information, pre-election, in order to convince Democrats to support a resolution favoring military action--this resolution should be immediately rescinded. Here are the three principles for a just war: a) Self-defense of one's self or an ally. b) That all remedies to prevent a war have been exhausted. c) That the war itself will not cause more harm than not having the war. The present situation does not fit into any of the above criteria and the very large body of world opinion supports this, as do the governments of most countries on the face of the earth.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next