BREAKING NEWS: PARTYTIME AGREES THAT INVASION IS JUSTIFIED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
question: "What would it take for you or anyone here to simply say, "That's it, he's gotta go."
PARTYTIME:
To:Mark Konrad who wrote (13836)
From: PartyTime Friday, Feb 28, 2003 2:22 AM
View Replies (1) | Respond to of 13859
Irrefutable proof that Saddam was involved in 9/11.
That he kicked the weapons inspectors out, when he didn't is insufficient reason;
that he's not in compliance with a UN Resolution,
(IRAQ IN MATERIAL BREACH OF U.N. RESOLUTION 1441 since December 7, 2002)
when others like Israel are as well, is insufficient reason;
that he used gas in previous warfare when his warring opponent did as well, is insufficient;
that America has to liberate people who've not asked to be liberated is an insufficient reason;
(so.........they have a referendum on the issue?
see INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS:)
Message 18634893
that America has unilaterally decided to change governments in the Middle East is also an insufficient reason.
Bush's invasion would be a clear violation of international law.
(NOT TRUE)
Moreover, he used bogus information, pre-election, in order to convince Democrats to support a resolution favoring military action--this resolution should be immediately rescinded.
Here are the three principles for a just war:
a) Self-defense of one's self or an ally.
(NOT TRUE)
b) That all remedies to prevent a war have been exhausted.
(THEY HAVE)
c) That the war itself will not cause more harm than not having the war.
(Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the survival and the success of liberty.
John F. Kennedy
The present situation does not fit into any of the above criteria and the very large body of world opinion supports this, as do the governments of most countries on the face of the earth.
(NOT TRUE)
---------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: comments in parenthesis are mine |
