The Nasdaq, truly, fell some 40% prior to the end of Clinton's time, and the Economy was NOT remaining strong as you suggest. You are inventing realities, do you really not know it? We KNOW that the unfortunate change of direction that was taking place in the market AND the Economy during Clintons last year, merely continued as it had begun, after he left. As I was saying, economists well recognize delayed effects, which tells all reasonable people that at minimum, both Clinton's final year and Bush's first year, are economically on Clinton, if on any President. Yet in your bias you are oblivious to the practical unbelievability of your position. Democrats towing your line will be stomped, IMO. Americans lived it, and the great undecided middle of the road "Democrats for Reagan" and the like, will see right through such phony arguments, IMO.
Dan B |
