Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: JohnM who wrote (78548)	2/28/2003 11:35:46 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (2) of 281500

Walzer's argument is honest, and the exercise shows why he has so little company making it. Arguing containment can work means that there must be consistent international pressure on Saddam. Arguing that there must be consistent international pressure on Saddam has to acknowlege that there has been anything but, with no good ideas how to reverse the trend. Both Clinton and Powell (pre 9/11) tried going to the UN and arguing for a renewal of a 'smart sanctions' regime; what did it get them? Glenn Reynolds comments on Walzer: The trouble with multilateralism is that it requires other nations who are both morally responsible and militarily capable. There's a shortage of both.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next