PartyTime,
I detect more than a little sweating under the armpits in your frivolous answer to my question asking if you were advocating the destruction of the US Constitution.
And I note you only answered my question after I insisted upon it.
What do your fellows on your America-hating, Israel-hating thread think of your sweating and your near groveling in the "answer" I finally dragged out of you?
______________________________________________________
HERE IS THE EXCHANGE:
To:Fillmore Hagan who wrote (14370)
From: PartyTime Saturday, Mar 1, 2003 2:58 PM
View Replies (1) | Respond to of 14378
I think Congress, due to pressure from the people, should rescind funding for the executive branch of government, in effect, making Bush powerless to govern. Unable to govern Bush would need congressional approval to fund any act. Lame Duck him until the next elections when he can be replaced.
_______________________________________________________
To:PartyTime who wrote (14375)
From: paret Saturday, Mar 1, 2003 3:02 PM
Respond to of 14378
You are proposing elimination of the separate branches of the US government.
Have you ever heard of the US Constitution ??????
Do you want it destroyed?
Sounds like you do.
_____________________________________________________
To:paret who wrote (14419)
From: PartyTime Saturday, Mar 1, 2003 6:45 PM
Respond to of 14434
Yes, I thought the answer was obvious when I first posed my suggestion. Do note that the manner in which I wrote what I wrote was to emphasize my wish that Bush be powerless. That without a buget by which to operate from he would effectively be held powerless, and that he'd remain a figurehead until he's voted out of office.
Indeed, the Constitution gives the power of the budget to the US House of Representatives. Were that buget withheld from the president, he would, in effect, have to shut the government down. Congress could hold him hostage to its wants by releasing only monies allocated to specific intentions, such as transportation, or health, etc. Congress could deprive Bush of his war budget.
A very unlikely scenario and I'm well aware of the unliklihood of such a proposal. My expression was more to register dissatisfaction with Bush's policies, than anything else.
In closing, I think you missed the satire of my remarks and took them too serious--lol!
_________________________________________________________ |
