Thanks for the link, Floyd. I had forgotten that 144 filings were available at that website.
You are wrong about one little important thing though. The form does not contain a block for the account number. Oh well, there goes your flawed theory.
The broker's name provided on the form is only the broker through which you intend to sell the shares. You don't even have to have an account at that brokerage firm. You might have the certificates in your possession and intend to send them to that broker so they can be sold. A Form 144 must be filed before unregistered stock can be sold, but it does not require the filer to sell stock or indicate in any way that it has already been sold.
Let's say that a person intends to deliver shares to broker A, but instead sends them to broker B because broker B offers a lower commission. That would not constitute an intentional misstatement or omission of facts. The broker's name is way down there in importance of information provided on the form. The issuer's name, Shareholder's name, Relationship to the issuer, and number of shares are the most important pieces of data.
It wouldn't matter if Dick had an account at Sovereign anyway. Where are you going with this, Floyd? Using your bogus logic, every broker and account holder at Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch, Salomon Smith Barney, and CSFB are crooked. Do you know anybody that has accounts at those firms? Are they all crooks? Is this the best smut that you can dig up to counter Matrixx's positive fundamentals, some of which are outlined in Message 18657514 ? How long are you going to carry a grudge against Matrixx? Maybe until their earnings are over $1.00 per share? |
