SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 249.89+3.1%Nov 26 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JSwanson who wrote (68370)3/8/2003 5:57:45 PM
From: Sarmad Y. Hermiz  Read Replies (1) of 70976
 
>> Why didn't they just say enough is enough we don't think Saddam is a threat anymore?

Because the US has repeatedly stated that it will not agree to lifting sanctions regardless of whether weapons are eliminated or not.

The purpose of res 1441 was to prohibit the US from claiming that it has UN authorization to attack Iraq. The US agreed to that because it was sure it could present convincing evidence to get a second specific resolution authorizing attack.

The "second resolution" would rely on the results of inspections to look into US claims about "overwhelming" weapons evidence. So a mechanism was put into place, specified to the minutest detail by the US, where claims by the US and UK regarding weapons could be proved true or false. This would be done by repeated, aggressive and intrusive inspection, with the active support of US and UK spy agencies.

You could see for yourself whether or not this evidence convinced anyone. So far Bulgaria is firmly on board.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext