SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : GUMM - Eliminate the Common Cold
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mike M who wrote (4283)3/9/2003 1:21:17 PM
From: Mad2  Read Replies (1) of 5582
 
You said the sales would begin to falter, year over year, just as those of QGLY did. None of those things happened. Wrong Mike, my analysis of this has been dead on all along

One thing that has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt is that during a bear market, stocks can be mutilated by short selling
Don't blame MTXX problems on a bear market or shorts.
Fact is the short interest today is 40% of what it was in Oct/Nov of 1998.
See post below;
Message 7688996
Fact is insiders got out, options and the Davidson deal lead to dilution because the company was overvalued all along. The problem with this stock has absolutly nothing to do with short sellers at all......stop your crazy obsession with shorts and their views.......You want to believe its the shorts, but it isn't. Mike investing is a big boys game, stick to the facts please!
As for bear market it hasn't hurt QGLY, check this out(2 yr comp of QGLY and MTXX):
finance.yahoo.com
Of course at the time you were too wrapped up in MTXX/GUMM still ignorant of valuation issues, global factors effecting the market (I told you the market lost its tolerance for stocks that offered promise with no results.
You boldly compared GUMM to CSCO at the time, to which I told you CSCO was the stock of the last 10 years not the next 10.
Mike, my only problem with the statement "this discussion should end" is that you, Dan and everyone else that has promoted GUMM/MTXX as a investment have been dead wronge.
Unfortunatly its your's and Dan's onesided perspective and closed mindedness that inhibits real discussion from taking place, discussion that could lead to profitable positions.
My problem with Danny boy is he attempts to project a "credible" image in what appears to be a effort to influence others.............why I ask! Is he a paid tout or a damn fool?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News