SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : My House
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Solon who wrote (5793)3/10/2003 5:03:42 PM
From: Original Mad Dog  Read Replies (1) of 7689
 
How do we put teeth into enforcement when the only teeth that Saddam seems to cooperate with is the overt threat of military force. Even after he helped himself to Kuwait and we built up our troops over there, he refused to leave until we attacked. Should we still be talking about that with him, or was the ouster the right thing to do? And was it only the right thing to do because he crossed a border, as opposed to violating an agreement not to make terrible weapons? Are we to always wait until he attacks before doing anything?

If we are, then disarmament is pointless, and preparing for the next war is the only logical course of action.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News