SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tejek who wrote (163532)3/10/2003 9:20:27 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 1572107
 
More then 4-5% is unaccounted for.

It amazes me how the right knows better than everyone else what's true. If you don't have the backup, please don't make such definitive statements in the future and expect me to respond.


Report says Iraq has new weapon
N.Y. Times says bomblets could strew biological agents

msnbc.com

iraqwatch.org

iraqwatch.org

iraqwatch.org

iraqwatch.org

You don't have solid backup for the 4 to 5%. You had once posted a link to an inspectors opinion that 95 or 96% was destroyed but other information has come out since then, and no one excpet Saddam or his top cronies are in a good position to know what percentage was destroyed.

David posted information about millions of pounds of unaccounted for chem weapons and enough growth medium to grow an enormous amount of bio weapons. I've seen the same information from other source and I know I could find it but I don't want to spend the time right now. I'll drop the "more then 4-5% is unaccounted for, if you drop the "all but 4-5% was destroyed. You don't have solid evidence of your claim, and even if it is true the 4 to 5% would still be dangerous.

Tim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext