Bill Wexler's Dog Pound Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound

REFR 1.340

+1.5%

Jan 16 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: N. Dixon who wrote (9329)	3/11/2003 4:59:56 AM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (1) of 10293

Well Dixon, to say that REFR shareholders aren't "typical" is fair enough. Your own "self-exoneration" is hilarious, though — a poster who loudmouths with disregard towards the maturity of winning battles vs. winning wars. Your sole concentration is upon a person who thinks your pet stock sucks. And it does suck. Just go out and get some real sales contracts. Revenues exceeding expenses never hurt a balance sheet. Unless, that is, it's yours. How many years you been showing us rhetoric vs. showing positive EPS? How much more simple can the question get? Rhetoric = "what"? EPS = "what"?" Hey, it's your 40-year old company that never made anything. Where do we start? Or, why are you apologizing for them? <gg> "Wrong. But I understand your confusion. REFR shareholders aren't typical. It's not a stock you would know about unless you knew someone in the glass industry or heard about it from a friend. It makes sense to me why shorts would initially see it as a target."

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next