SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: KLP who wrote (81196)3/11/2003 2:12:39 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
Karen,

I can comment on your observations about Jim McDermott only slightly since I don't know any details but I doubt McDermott would agree that it was in support of Saddam. I think it's important to distinguish between the reasons folk offer for these ventures and our own analysis of the likely consequences.

As for Jimmy Carter, however, if you argue that his op ed piece is in support of Saddam, are you then arguing that all opposition to the Bush administration's Iraq policy supports Saddam? If not, which seems to you to be legitimate opposition and which seems to be in support? Is it possible, in short, in your mind for folk to oppose Bush and not support Saddam?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News