Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (81881)	3/13/2003 4:37:49 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (2) of 281500

"Eventually, Israel will do one or the other (move the Arabs or the Settlers). And only one of those ways leads to peace." Jacob, I agree with you, settlements should go. I believe in the 1967 lines too, with modest, mutually acceptable modifications. However the last statement is wrong. Since the deal cant be struck in a terrorist environement, the other solution may just happen as Pals leave voluntarily and israelis excercise self defense which would equal repression and perhaps expulsion. If the arabs leave and/or are forced out, there can be peace with the jordan river as a definable natural border. What about Gaza? Perhaps give that back to egypt if they will have it and build the mother of all fences there. But dont get nervous, the removal of settlers is my first choice and the best one today, although the passing of time, freedom and people make it less likely as we go on. Pals must stop terrorism--they must renounce it--and believe in a non-terrorist solution. Where is the Pal Ghandi or MLK? mike

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next