SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (164153)3/13/2003 10:40:09 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (4) of 1573690
 
What is offensive to me is how so many men claim to know what's best for the people who will actually bear the brunt of whatever is decided. Now that takes hubris.

No more hubris then the women who impose their decision on the unborn child. No more hubris then the men who pressure women in to abortions because they don't want to support the child.


A fetus doesn't have an active brain; a woman does.

Also there are millions of women who are pro-life.

More are pro choice......you would think that would tell you something.

But what might take the most hubris of all is to say that a group (men) that are almost 50% of the population should't get a say in one of the most controversial issues of the day. Not just "there wrong and the law should let the pregnant woman decide" but rather "they shouldn't get any input in to what the law should say".

Most women feel that men have had more than their fair share of say.

What about post menapausal or infertile women? If they can't "bear the brunt of whatever is decided" do they not get to have a say on the political issue?

Do you think you know better than an infertile woman whats best for women? I know I wouldn't want women telling me if I should get circumsized or not.

ted
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext